Python requires
Warning
This is an experimental feature subject to breaking changes in future releases.
Note
This syntax supersedes the legacy python_requires() syntax. The most important changes are:
These new python_requires affect the consumers
package_id
. So different binaries can be managed, and CI systems can re-build affected packages according to package ID modes and versioning policies.The syntax defines a class attribute instead of a module function call, so recipes are cleaner and more aligned with other types of requirements.
The new python_requires will play better with lockfiles and deterministic dependency graphs.
They are able to extend base classes more naturally without conflicts of ConanFile classes.
Introduction
The python_requires
feature is a very convenient way to share files and code between
different recipes. A python requires is similar to any other recipe, it is the way it is
required from the consumer what makes the difference.
A very simple recipe that we want to reuse could be:
from conans import ConanFile
myvar = 123
def myfunct():
return 234
class Pkg(ConanFile):
pass
And then we will make it available to other packages with conan export
. Note that we are
not calling conan create
, because this recipe doesn’t have binaries. It is just the python
code that we want to reuse.
$ conan export . pyreq/0.1@user/channel
We can reuse the above recipe functionality with:
from conans import ConanFile
class Pkg(ConanFile):
python_requires = "pyreq/0.1@user/channel"
def build(self):
v = self.python_requires["pyreq"].module.myvar # v will be 123
f = self.python_requires["pyreq"].module.myfunct() # f will be 234
self.output.info("%s,%s" % (v, f))
$ conan create . pkg/0.1@user/channel
...
pkg/0.1@user/channel: 123, 234
It is also possible to require more than one python-require, and use the package name to address the functionality:
from conans import ConanFile
class Pkg(ConanFile):
python_requires = "pyreq/0.1@user/channel", "other/1.2@user/channel"
def build(self):
v = self.python_requires["pyreq"].module.myvar # v will be 123
f = self.python_requires["other"].module.otherfunc("some-args")
Extending base classes
A common use case would be to reuse methods of a base class. So we could write a recipe like:
from conans import ConanFile
class MyBase(object):
def source(self):
self.output.info("My cool source!")
def build(self):
self.output.info("My cool build!")
def package(self):
self.output.info("My cool package!")
def package_info(self):
self.output.info("My cool package_info!")
class PyReq(ConanFile):
name = "pyreq"
version = "0.1"
And make it available for reuse with:
$ conan export . user/channel
Note that there are 2 classes, MyBase
is the one intended for inheritance, and do not
extend ConanFile
. The other PyReq
is the one that defines the current package being
exported.
Now, other packages, could python_require
it, and inherit from MyBase
class with:
from conans import ConanFile
class Pkg(ConanFile):
python_requires = "pyreq/0.1@user/channel"
python_requires_extend = "pyreq.MyBase"
So creating the package we can see how the methods from the base class are reused:
$ conan create . pkg/0.1@user/channel
...
pkg/0.1@user/channel: My cool source!
pkg/0.1@user/channel: My cool build!
pkg/0.1@user/channel: My cool package!
pkg/0.1@user/channel: My cool package_info!
...
Limitations
There are a few limitations that should be taken into account:
name
andversion
fields shouldn’t be inherited.set_name()
andset_version()
might be used.short_paths
cannot be inherited from apython_requires
. Make sure to specify it directly in the recipes that need the paths shortened in Windows.exports
,exports_sources
shouldn’t be inherited from a base class, but explictly defined directly in the recipes. A reusable alternative might be using theSCM
component.build_policy
shouldn’t be inherited from a base class, but explictly defined directly in the recipes.
Reusing files
It is possible to access the files exported by a recipe that is used with python_requires
.
We could have this recipe, together with a myfile.txt file containing the “Hello” text.
from conans import ConanFile
class PyReq(ConanFile):
exports = "*"
$ echo "Hello" > myfile.txt
$ conan export . pyreq/0.1@user/channel
Now the recipe has been exported, we can access its path (the place where myfile.txt is) with the
path
attribute:
import os
from conans import ConanFile, load
class Pkg(ConanFile):
python_requires = "pyreq/0.1@user/channel"
def build(self):
pyreq_path = self.python_requires["pyreq"].path
myfile_path = os.path.join(pyreq_path, "myfile.txt")
content = load(myfile_path) # content = "Hello"
self.output.info(content)
# we could also copy the file, instead of reading it
Note that only exports
work for this case, but not exports_sources
.
PackageID
The python-requires
will affect the package_id
of the packages using those dependencies.
By default, the policy is minor_mode
, which means:
Changes to the patch version of a python-require will not affect the package ID. So depending on
"pyreq/1.2.3"
or"pyreq/1.2.4"
will result in identical package ID (both will be mapped to"pyreq/1.2.Z"
in the hash computation). Bump the patch version if you want to change your common code, but you don’t want the consumers to be affected or to fire a re-build of the dependants.Changes to the minor or major version will produce a different package ID. So if you depend on
"pyreq/1.2.3"
, and you bump the version to"pyreq/1.3.0"
, then, you will need to build new binaries that are using that new python-require. Bump the minor or major version if you want to make sure that packages requiring this python-require will be built using these changes in the code.Both changing the minor and major requires a new package ID, and then a build from source. You could use changes in the minor to indicate that it should be source compatible, and consumers wouldn’t need to do changes, and changes in the major for source incompatible changes.
As with the regular requires
, this default can be customized. First you can customize it at attribute
global level, modifying the conan.conf [general]
variable default_python_requires_id_mode
, which can take the values
unrelated_mode
, semver_mode
, patch_mode
, minor_mode
, major_mode
, full_version_mode
,
full_recipe_mode
and recipe_revision_mode
.
For example, if you want to make the package IDs never be affected by any change in the versions of python-requires, you could do:
[general]
default_python_requires_id_mode=unrelated_mode
Read more about these modes in Using package_id() for Package Dependencies.
It is also possible to customize the effect of python_requires
per package, using the package_id()
method:
from conans import ConanFile class Pkg(ConanFile): python_requires ="pyreq/[>=1.0]" def package_id(self): self.info.python_requires.patch_mode()
Resolution of python-requires
There are few things that should be taken into account when using python-requires
:
Python requires recipes are loaded by the interpreter just once, and they are common to all consumers. Do not use any global state in the
python-requires
recipes.Python requires are private to the consumers. They are not transitive. Different consumers can require different versions of the same python-require.
python-requires
can use version ranges expressions.python-requires
canpython-require
other recipes too, but this should probably be limited to very few cases, we recommend to use the simplest possible structure.python-requires
can conflict if they require other recipes and create conflicts in different versions.python-requires
cannot use regularrequires
orbuild_requires
.It is possible to use
python-requires
without user and channel.python-requires
can use native pythonimport
to other python files, as long as these are exported together with the recipe.python-requires
should not create packages, but useexport
only.python-requires
can be used as editable packages too.python-requires
are locked in lockfiles.