This is an experimental feature subject to breaking changes in future releases.
As described before, lockfiles are immutable, they cannot change the information they contain. If some install or create command tries to change some data in a lockfile, it will error. This doesn’t mean that operations on lockfiles cannot be done, as it is possible to create a new lockfile from an existing one. We have already done this, obtaining a full lockfile for a specific configuration from an initial “base” lockfile.
There are several scenarios you might want to create a new lockfile from an existing one.
Deriving a partial lockfile¶
Lets say that we have an application
app/1.0 that depends on
libc/1.0 that depends on
that finally depends on
liba/1.0. We could capture a “base” lockfile from it, and then several full
lockfiles, one per configuration:
$ conan lock create --reference=app/1.0@ --base --lockfile-out=app_base.lock $ conan lock create --reference=app/1.0@ --lockfile=app_base.lock -s build_type=Release --lockfile-out=app_release.lock $ conan lock create --reference=app/1.0@ --lockfile=app_base.lock -s build_type=Debug --lockfile-out=app_debug.lock
Now a developer wants to start testing some changes in
libb, using the same dependencies versions defined
in the lockfile. As
libb is locked, it will not be possible to create a new version
libb/1.1 or build
a new binary for it with the existing lockfiles. But we can create a new lockfile for it in different ways.
For example, we could derive directly from the app_release.lock and app_debug.lock lockfiles:
$ git clone <libb-repo> && cd libb $ conan lock create conanfile.py --lockfile=app_release.lock --lockfile-out=libb_deps_release.lock $ conan lock create conanfile.py --lockfile=app_debug.lock --lockfile-out=libb_deps_debug.lock
This will create partial lockfiles, only for
libb dependencies, i.e. locking
liba/1.0, that can be used
while installing, building and testing
But it is also possible to derive a new “base” profile from app_base.lock only for libb dependencies, and then compute from it the configuration specific profiles.
These partial lockfiles will be smaller than the original app lockfiles, not containing information at all about
Integrating a partial lockfile¶
This would be the opposite flow. Lets take the previous libb_deps_release.lock and libb_deps_debug.lock
lockfiles and create new
libb/1.1 packages with it, and obtaining new lockfiles:
# in the libb source folder $ conan create . --lockfile=libb_deps_release.lock --lockfile-out=libb_release.lock $ conan create . --lockfile=libb_deps_debug.lock --lockfile-out=libb_debug.lock
These lockfiles will be containing locked information to
liba/1.0 and a new
Now we would like to check if
app/1.0 will pick this new version, and in case it is used, we would
like to rebuild whatever is necessary (that is part of the next CI section).
It is not possible to pick the old app_base.lock, app_release.lock or app_debug.lock
lockfiles and inject the new
libb/1.1 version, as this would be violating the integrity of the lockfile.
Nothing guarantees that the downstream packages will effectively use the new version, as it might fall outside
the valid range defined in
libc/1.0, for example. Also, downstream consumers
could result in different package-ids as a result of having a new dependency, and this goes against the
immutability of the lockfile data, as the package-ids for them would be already locked.
Let’s create new lockfiles that will use the existing
libb_release.lock information if possible:
$ conan lock create --reference=app/1.0@ --lockfile=libb_release.lock --lockfile-out=app_release.lock $ conan lock create --reference=app/1.0@ --lockfile=libb_debug.lock --lockfile-out=app_debug.lock
This will create new app_release.lock and app_debug.lock that will have both
locked. If for some reason,
libc/1.0 had fixed a
requires = "libb/1.0", then the resulting lockfile
would resolve and lock
libb/1.0 instead. The
build-order command (see next section) will tell us that there
is nothing to build, as it is effectively computing the same lockfile that existed before. It is also
possible, and a CI pipeline could do it, to directly check that
libb/1.1 is defined inside the new lockfiles.
If it is not there, it means that it didn’t integrate, and nothing needs to be done downstream.